By Craig Rucker
They claim that climate science is “settled” and beyond discussion, yet the computer models the whole thing depends on have called for warming which has not occurred since before the turn of the millennium.
Now they’re trying to claim that 2014 was the “hottest ever.”
This is absurd.
There was not very much warming during the second half of the 20th century and none since then. Only a few years managed to come in around 1/2 a degree Celsius above baseline — Not enough to cause extreme anything.
Now team warming is trying desperately to cobble together a few hundredths of a degree above 1998, while they know full well that a few hundredths are meaningless. Measurements are not that accurate. Hundredths are too small to matter. We’re still way under what the computer models project.
Hundredths warmer is like pennies richer.
More importantly, for them to make even this shallow claim, they have to cherry pick their data and completely ignore the U.S. and U.K. satellite data which they know full well is the best available.
Why ignore the best available world temperature data? Because it does not show any warming.
That’s where science ends and propaganda begins.
The next time a global warming campaigner tries to tell you that 2014 was the “hottest ever,” tell them to cool off — And stick with the satellite data they based the models on (the one’s with no warming).
No switching umpires in the middle of the game.
Craig Rucker is the executive director and co-founder of Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT).
Reproduced with permission from NetRightDaily.com: