2016 Election, Elections, Issues, Military, National Security, NewsEdge, Rand Paul

Paul hits rivals over military spending plans


Rand_Paul_5584558924-1024x683-300x200ALTOONA — Kentucky U.S. Sen. Rand Paul on Thursday questioned whether 2016 Republican presidential candidates can be considered true fiscal conservatives if they are liberal with military spending.

That’s a question Iowa Republicans heading to the Feb. 1 first-in-the-nation precinct caucuses will have to decide, said Paul, who took aim at GOP rival Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida and his plans to boost spending for defense and refundable tax credits that would add to the national debt.

“The real debate we have is over who is a fiscal conservative,” Rand told a gathering at the Pizza Ranch in Altoona. “Can you be a fiscal conservative if you’re liberal with military spending? People have not thought about it this way, and that’s why I’m challenging people to rethink their presuppositions and rethink what makes America strong and what makes America great.”

Military spending must be done in the context of a budget strategy to better prioritize and “hold the line” on necessary expenditures while squeezing down the size of government along with tax and regulatory burdens on U.S. taxpayers, he said.

“People say, ‘What’s the biggest threat to our national security?’ I think it’s our debt,” Paul told the group. “I’m a Reagan conservative. I believe in peace through strength. I believe in a strong military, but I don’t believe in spending so much that we bankrupt the country.”

Paul said he recently filibustered against a bipartisan federal budget compromise because it did not address the reform needed to chart a new fiscal direction with strict spending caps for a nation approaching $20 trillion in debt.

“The dirty little secret of Washington and why our country is going bankrupt — the right wants more money for the military and in an unlimited fashion, and the left wants more money for welfare. It’s an unholy alliance.”

At Thursday’s event, Paul continued an exchange he had with Rubio during Tuesday’s GOP debate. Rubio’s proposals, Paul said, could add $2 trillion to the national debt by boosting spending for the military and refundable tax credits “that have a 25 percent fraud rate.” He also said the inspector general indicated a sizable share of credits under the existing program “are going to illegal aliens.”

The Paul-Rubio dispute is among a number of niche battles among GOP candidates that have developed recently. Rubio and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz sparred over immigration policy Thursday; former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush took shots Wednesday in Iowa at New York businessman Donald Trump over sending refugees back to Syria; and Trump has targeted competing front-runner and political newcomer Ben Carson on several fronts.

Steve Grubbs, a former state legislator and Iowa GOP chairman who is a top Paul adviser, likened the Republican race to a professional wrestling “battle royale” where all the combatants enter the ring and compete until one remains.

“I think the last 80 days will be like a battle royale with candidates trying to throw each other out of the ring,” Grubbs said after Thursday’s event.

Paul told the Pizza Ranch crowd he is eyeing the top prize when the first tally in the 2016 GOP nominating process is taken in Iowa.

“Our goal is to win,” he said, “not to place, not to show, but to win.”

pdf_rtf_top mobile-amservice-logo

By Rod Boshart, The Gazette, Cedar Rapids, Iowa

(c)2015 The Gazette (Cedar Rapids, Iowa)

Visit The Gazette (Cedar Rapids, Iowa) at thegazette.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

  • skipsart

    I remember two great presidents, one who said: “Walk softly and carry a big stick” and the other who said:
    “Peace through strength” Does Rand think we should ignore this advice?

  • Steve Urbalejo

    I doubt any talk, is going to stop the candidates from continuing to run and try for the gold ring.. Trump, will remain steadfast and the bone pickers will keep circling above trying to eliminate the GOP ticket. Rand is fighting a losing battle about the military, when he knows that the Messiah obama has dissolved so much of the military in his fraudulent almost 8 years. We need the military to be strengthened and his ante is less than satisfactory for the security of this country. Trump, has the backing of those who are tired of the politics and poor leadership that obama has dealt this country and wish him gone. He has polarized this country with diminishing the military and acting as a imperial potentate, uncaring about the country, only what he can do to destroy its prominence in the world. Sadly, almost to the gray area of being treasonous. So Rand, might as well turn to another avenue, if he wishes to remain as a candidate and look to strengthening this country, not diminishing its role.

Sign up for our FREE newsletter!

Sign up to receive daily updates, political news, action letters and additional messages from Conservative Republican News

View our Privacy Policy

Join our FREE Newsletter!