Big Government, Constitution, Economy, Issues

E-cigarettes helped me quit smoking, saved my life

0

E-cigarettes are a relatively inexpensive smoke cessation product — and they probably saved my life.

Thanks to short-term, temporary use of a refillable e-cigarette, I was able to quit smoking cigarettes on a consistent basis for the first time since I started smoking 20 years ago.

This is not a scientific study. Nor a paid advertisement. I am getting married, and my fiancé demanded I quit smoking, and suggested I use the e-cigarette to stop.vaping

Now, several months later, I no longer use the e-cigarette and, crucially, I did not return to smoking. I certainly thank my fiancé — thanks, babe! — whose nagging was undoubtedly helpful, too, but mostly it was her suggestion that I use the e-cigarette instead of other products I had failed to quit smoking with in the past.

That they were significantly cheaper than nicotine patches or gum — which are highly regulated by the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Drug Evaluation and Research — was a huge bonus, too.

When I had tried quitting with nicotine gum, I was shelling out something on the order of $10 to $15 for every 20 pieces of gum, or $0.50 to $0.75 for every single craving. It was more expensive than cigarettes! A pack of 20 cigarettes was still less than $10, even as highly taxed as they are in Northern Virginia. Cigarettes were costing me about $0.40 per craving.

In contrast, I could get a refillable e-cigarette —  which can last several weeks depending on frequency of use — for about $25 and then the liquid for about $8 per canister.

Instantly, I noticed a huge difference. I wasn’t using the e-cigarette as much. Just a puff here or there satisfied my craving. Each canister of e-liquid lasted weeks, instead of days. Suddenly, my cost per craving was reduced to about $0.17.

This gave me two incentives to use the e-cigarette: save my life and save money. The gum I had tried could only claim one or two of these, but since it had failed so many times for me, really it could claim neither.

Now, I’m off the e-cigarette. Apparently just in time. The FDA has now stepped in with costly new regulations on e-cigarettes that will undoubtedly make them more expensive to purchase.

How perverse is that? The government — in a supposed bid to “save” lives — is guaranteeing through regulation to make it more expensive to purchase products, e-cigarettes, that can help save lives.

Perhaps the FDA is trying to pick winners and losers in the market. Maybe they think e-cigarettes are too cheap and the gum and patch makers are losing money. Who knows?

If the FDA was honest, instead of making e-cigarettes more expensive, they would get out of the way and allow for the markets to work — the way they worked for me.

What if the cost per craving on an e-cigarette gets higher than buying cigarettes? What will happen? For me, it took a few months to ween off the nicotine. But if it had cost more than the cigarettes cost, like the gum, perhaps I would not have persevered.

Again, this is not a scientific study or anything. Just my own personal experience. For whatever reason, this is the time I quit.

Perhaps it really was my fiancé nagging me. Or the monetary savings of the e-cigarette versus actual cigarettes. Or maybe, just maybe, for me, a smoker of 20 years, the e-cigarette was a more effective product.

And it saved my life.

Thank goodness I was able to finally quit smoking. And I didn’t even need a government-regulated product to do it. Perhaps that is why the FDA is moving in to stop e-cigarettes.

This is a guest post by Robert Romano senior editor of Americans for Limited Government.

Sign up for our FREE newsletter!

Sign up to receive daily updates, political news, action letters and additional messages from Conservative Republican News

View our Privacy Policy

Join our FREE Newsletter!