Issues, Political correctness

How the left controls the language and the argument


Ever wonder why those on the left who are opposed to personal choice on every level other than abortion refer to themselves as pro-choice?  That’s simple, because it sounds better that what it really is, pro-abortion.  In the mass media there is no such thing as pro-abortion.  Through this sleight of the rhetorical hand those opposed to the taking of an innocent human life are labeled as anti-choice.

One of the keys to leftist success is the manipulation of the language. Moral issues become social issues. The Strategic Defense Initiative became Star Wars as in science fiction. Tax raises become revenue enhancements. Although women outnumber men in America they are linked to minorities.

Had anyone ever heard of a Transgender person five years ago?  Certainly we had all heard of transvestites and cross dressers.  The Collins English Dictionary defines them as follows:  1. (Psychiatry) a person who seeks sexual pleasure from wearing clothes that are normally associated with the opposite sex 2. any cross-dresser. See cross-dressing.

What was once viewed as a psychological oddity has now been relabeled and turned into a movement.  We now have the spectacle of the federal government by edict taking control of school restrooms and showers under the guise of equality.

The left claims it is the ideology that believes in science except when they don’t.  The American College of Pediatricians put out a statement in March of this year stating, “Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: ‘XY’ and ‘XX’ are genetic markers of health — not genetic markers of a disorder. The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species. This principle is self-evident.”

Another example of the left manipulating the language is the United States Congress banning words the left does not approve of from the United State Code and changing them to more politically correct terms. They are calling this, “modernization.” House Resolution 4238 reads in part, “Office of Minority Economic Impact.—Section 211(f)(1) of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7141(f)(1)) is amended by striking ‘a Negro, Puerto Rican, American Indian, Eskimo, Oriental, or Aleut or is a Spanish speaking individual of Spanish descent’ and inserting ‘Asian American, Native Hawaiian, a Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, Puerto Rican, Native American, or an Alaska Native.’” The Congress is now the language police.redskins offensive

Also a part of the leftist language agenda is the constant calls for the renaming of streets, schools, sports teams like the Washington Redskins and anything thing else that offends their tender feelings. This gives them the opportunity to take a false moral high ground while schooling the rest of us on our moral failings for not recognizing how right they are. It also subtlety attacks western culture and history. The irony of this coming from an ideology responsible for more human misery and death than any other political movement in history seems to escape them.

The way to fight this is not to go along with the cultural distortion of the left through the modification of the common vernacular. There is no such thing as social studies in schools. It is history. Social issues are not social issues they are moral issues. There is no pro-choice movement it is a pro-abortion movement. People are not trans-anything they either male or female.  If they think otherwise they are mentally ill. If you accept the leftist language distortions you are accepting the premise of their arguments.

This is a guest post by Don Todd Director of Research of Americans for Limited Government.
  • I agree with the thread of this article, but I OBJECT to your assumption in the following phrase:

    “…those opposed to the taking of an innocent human life are labeled as anti-choice.”

    Your use of this phrase ASSUMES that the fetus is a human life, and it is therefore clear that you are “anti-choice”.

    I am “opposed to the taking of an innocent human life”. I just don’t consider a fetus as a “human life”, and therefore I am in favor of the mother’s right to choose abortion. This is what “pro-choice” means!

    • KayO

      So, are you saying that a woman carrying a child is a mother and not a host?

      • No.

        • KayO

          Then, to which “mother’s rights” are you referring?

          • Obiously, you are trying to make a point. Please do so directly. I do not wish to get into a discussion about abortion. That is a completely different topic from the one I presented, which is the biased nature of the statement that I quoted.

          • I-RIGHT-I

            “I do not wish to get into a discussion about abortion.”
            Translation: “I don’t want to talk about what I was talking about.”
            Nice one kid.

          • KayO

            If it’s obvious, then I believe I made my point.

          • It’s obvious that “you are trying to make a point”, but the point itself is NOT obvious. I’m getting bored with this thread, and since I already made MY point, I’m calling it a day.

          • KayO

            I made my point, and it was clear. Good day to you.

          • BonLovesFreedom

            Hey KayO ~ Not much of a ‘Professor’ is he…oh wait, maybe he just meant professor – not someone with intelligence and morality, but a professor of his personal beliefs. I had to laugh at his responses to your posts. He obviously found them overwhelmingly challenging. LOL Have a good rest of the week.
            Fetuses ARE human beings…they don’t morph into a person when they hit oxygen!!

Sign up for our FREE newsletter!

Sign up to receive daily updates, political news, action letters and additional messages from Conservative Republican News

View our Privacy Policy

Join our FREE Newsletter!