Communications, Hillary Clinton, Issues

Google Is Rigging Searches For Hillary Clinton


This is huge news – but it is hardly surprising.

Google – President Barack Obama’s biggest crony in a sea full of armadas full of legions of Obama cronies – has been cozying up to the woman Obama just endorsed to succeed him: Hillary Clinton.

And by “cozying up” – we mean warping their search results to hide Clinton’s decades of scandals and scandalous behavior.

Last year, Wired magazine warned us about the election-manipulating power of Google:

Google’s Search Algorithm Could Steal the Presidency: “‘We estimate, based on win margins in national elections around the world,’ says Robert Epstein, a psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology and one of the study’s authors, ‘that Google could determine the outcome of upwards of 25 percent of all national elections.’”

So the goods on Google delivered by SourceFed and their host/writer Matt Lieberman – are devastatingly awful. As chronicled in their recently released stand-up video with visual aides. We will lean heavily on excerpted transcripts therefrom – because what they’ve done is so beautiful and terrible. Here we go:

There’s an inherent trust that when you Google something, you are seeing the actual factual answer to your query or question. Based at least in part on the results of what other people are actually searching for.

In the case of Hillary Clinton – who clinched the Democratic nomination – we know for a fact that that is not the case….SourceFed has discovered that Google has been actively altering search recommendations in favor of Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

So quietly that we were unable to see it for what it was until today (SourceFed posted their video on June 9).

When we type – “Hillary Clinton cri” – into Google, the site’s auto-complete function shows three potential searches: “Hillary Clinton crime reform,” “Hillary Clinton crisis” and “Hillary Clinton Crime Bill 1994.”

However, when you type the same term – “Hillary Clinton cri” – into Google’s competitors Bing and Yahoo, you get very different results. Focusing on whether or not Hillary Clinton has ever committed a crime.

It’s like if you put three people into a room that’s on fire – and two out of the three people yell “Fire!” And the third person yells “I’m in a room.’”

That’s…odd. The video then demonstrates that there aren’t even enough Google user searches for “Hillary Clinton crime reform” for Google to graph – using Google’s own “Trends” function. So why is that their #1 auto-complete suggestion? There are plenty of Google “Hillary Clinton crime” searches on “Trends” – but Google doesn’t offer up that auto-possibility. Hmmmm….

When you type – “Hillary Clinton ind” – into Bing or Yahoo, there are plenty of indictment-based recommendations. When you type it into Google, the top two recommendations are “Hillary Clinton Indiana” and “Hillary Clinton India.”….

When we entered them both into “Trends,” people were searching for “Hillary Clinton indictment” eight times more often than “Hillary Clinton India.”

Yet Google auto-offers us “India” – and not “indictment.”

The intention is clear: Google is burying potential searches for terms that could have hurt Hillary Clinton in the primary elections over the past several months by limiting recommendations on their site.

For comparison, we searched for negative terms that have been associated in the media with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump on all three sites. Specifically, – “Bernie Sanders soc” – for socialist and – “Donald Trump rac” – for racist or racism. This time, Google matched the recommendations of Bing and Yahoo. No visible tampering.

Google’s bias here is undeniable.

Indeed it is. Just as it is and has been with now-President Obama – since before he was President Obama.

Obama Gets Backing of Google CEO Eric Schmidt (October 20, 2008)

Getting in on the Democrat administration ground floor is a Google-Schmidt crony-business model.

There are a stunning number of links between Google and (Clinton’s) campaign, and they all stem to one person in particular. Eric Schmidt, the Executive Chairman of Google’s parent company Alphabet, Inc. and former CEO of Google – is also a major funder of “The Groundwork.”

Which is, according to sources acquired by Wired, an investment by Schmidt to ensure that Hillary Clinton has the technological and engineering prowess to win the election….They are one of the Clinton campaign’s priciest outside contractors….

So Eric Schmidt – the former head of Google who is chairman of their parent company – funds a data analysis company that works for the Hillary campaign. Whose chief technology officer Stephanie Hannon – is a former Google executive….

(These connections) showcase a man (Schmidt) who has a clear and vested interest in how our country is run – and is actively funding one candidate to run it, while the company he advises is warping search results in her favor.  

Why does that sort of preemptive investment sound familiar?

Google’s Eric Schmidt Invests in Obama’s Big Data Brains

Because it is familiar.

So Eric Schmidt and his Google are doing their very best to rig the election for Clinton – in the hopes of delivering themselves another crony president.

So as to continue to reap for another four (or eight) years the ridiculous regulatory favoritism they have been so generously delivered these last eight.

Big Government, Big Business – and scratch-my-back cronyism on steroids between the two.

Welcome to 21st Century America.

This is a guest post by Seton Motley Founder and President of Less Government
  • GlobalThinkTank

    Google may be rigging searches,but this has more to due with how one searches; it is not hard to find articles relating to Hillary’s past criminal records. But the problem is, there are far too many sheople out there too distracted, too indifferent and uninterested in knowing about Hillary’s career criminal past… they just go on supporting her regardless the facts.

    Also, we are not living in a very, very Leftist Liberal climate, and much of today’s Mainstream Media is in control; they are responsible for failing to Air Unbiased and Impartial views of Hillary’s past, and they are responsible for failing to address real concerns for Asylees and Refugees and Immigration topics in an open and fair forum.

    However, the mainstream media does its best to openly criticize and ridicule Republicans, including Trump at every chance they get to steer public opinion; spin facts to make Hillary look good while Throwing Trump to the Curb over very Important Topics.

    Worse, we have a President that Openly Supports Hillary’s nomination for president; a Known criminal who thumbs her nose at each and every hearing she is the center off; of taking $100 of thousands, possibly Millions from ‘Public Speeches,’ avoids openness and honestly toward answers to Benghazi, and blatantly Violated a sworn duty and law regarding National Security and Information by her use of a Private Server (because she said, everyone else know and was doing it).

    We know Hillary has a stake in aiding Muslim Asylees and Refugees to America, she is also a direct supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood and had an Aid; Huma Abedin, working directly with top secret and highly sensitive information. Hillary is also a supporter with Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), and it is through this agency that America has countless Muslims in high positions in government that poses a direct conflict of interest to National Security.

    One doesn’t need to worry about Google manipulating searches; those who know, know how to find what they are looking for. We do our best to inform those who appear to don’t know, but they often don’t seem to care. The real problem is due to the way the Mainstream Media portrays topics with bias and spin… regrettably, this is not just Google, it is nearly every Liberal controlled news reporting agency… they are all working very hard in manipulating public opinion.

    • RLTMLT

      Conservative political and economic commentator, and former Reagan Administration official, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was quick to detect the real intent of certain political factions. He was one of the first to respond to the manipulation of this tragic event for Left Wing political purposes. He commented that none of his blog’s thousands of devoted followers even acknowledged the possibility that this was the case. In our defense, most of us are in denial of the fact that our government is now under the full control of special interests intent on furthering their private agendas which include obliterating all citizen’s Constitutional Rights !

Sign up for our FREE newsletter!

Sign up to receive daily updates, political news, action letters and additional messages from Conservative Republican News

View our Privacy Policy

Join our FREE Newsletter!