Big Government, Corruption, Issues, Labor Unions

Why are government employees still getting paid on official time to do union work?

2

Will Rogers is reported to have once said, “be thankful we’re not getting all the government we’re paying for.” While there are certainly many areas where we’re not getting what we pay for, one area where the problem is particularly acute is in an obscure federal personnel practice known as “official time.” Official time is a practice where a government employee is paid, not to do work for you as the taxpayer, but rather to work for the union representing the employees at the agency which employs this individual. The employee keeps their federal position, title, and all the benefits that go with being a federal employee, but works for a union instead of taxpayers. This is a direct subsidy to labor unions because they are getting free labor that, but for the practice, would be an expense they would have to handle out of their own treasury.

In years past the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) was in the habit of publishing an annual report on the practice, and the associated costs to taxpayers. In fiscal year 2012, the last year for which OPM has bothered to release the figures, the reported cost to taxpayers was over $157 million. That money could have been saved. While the OPM reports give dollar figures and account for the hours spent by agency officials on official time, they do not disclose how many employees are working 100 percent of the time for unions instead of taxpayers.

To give the public a better understanding on this issue Americans for Limited Government Foundation has filed a series of records requests using the federal Freedom of Information Act. These requests asked for records from each agency on how many of their employees are working 100 percent of the time for a union.

We have taken the information disclosed to us per these requests and compiled a report showing how many employees are working 100 percent of the time for unions, along with information related to their salary and the total salary cost to taxpayers.

Some of the information we received is staggering.

For example, the U.S. Department of Transportation has twenty-six employees that work 100 percent of the time for a union. These employees make as much as $183,300 per year, and their average salary is $141,221. That’s certainly a nice salary, especially when you consider the extensive, and expensive, benefits packages that are on top of this.

The U.S. Postal Service disclosed to us that they have 274 employees who work 100 percent of the time for a union, at a combined cost of over $16 million per year.

Like many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse within the federal government, this one continues year after year. Current law allows agency heads to negotiate with unions regarding how many people you and I as taxpayers will be paying to work for the union, instead of course, doing their actual job.

Next time you hear an agency official complain that they don’t have enough money to handle the things they are supposed to do, remember that they have plenty of areas where they can easily make cuts, and cuts that will not have any effect on their program activities. Spending money on official time is but one area of many where easy cuts could be made.

Additionally, there is an inherent problem with an agency forcing taxpayers to subsidize unions which are advocacy organizations. Unions, of course, then turn around and lobby the government seeking more money and benefits for their members. Just like we should not be using taxpayer dollars to subsidize other advocacy organizations such as the National Rifle Association or the Sierra Club, we should not be subsidizing unions either. If the National Rifle Association or the Sierra Club want to raise money to fund their operations that is their prerogative. It is not, however, the proper place of the federal government to be funding them, or unions, using your hard-earned tax dollars.

This is a guest post by Nathan Mehrens President of Americans for Limited Government Foundation.
  • Robert

    Useful information but also somewhat biased. In every Union shop the Shop Steward is paid by the Company he works for and gets all the benefits of that Company but is still working for the union. It is that way every place i have seen a Union Work place. The worker even gets paid while he is talking to the Union Steward, which is another loss to the Employer, All this could take place after work or during lunch breaks.
    It is not just the Government it is US Union Shop wide.
    HAVE A NICE DAY

  • RLTMLT

    Given the current status of labor unions in this country, one has to conclude that this story is addressing a non-problem. The Democrats, the so called party of unions based solely on the support afforded them by the Roosevelt Administration during the Great Depression, have done nothing over the past 69 years to reverse the debilitating restrictions placed on unions by the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act. Bill Clinton has said that Democrats put up with unions that back them in elections but Democrats have no real obligation to them and they have no where else to go ! Given that most of the former unionized living wage manufacturing jobs have been exported to low wage foreign countries, the union remains on life support today as unions like the SEIU who are totally dependent on low wage service employees that have no real benefits and can’t afford to pay exorbitant union dues. All in all a situation that has in large part contributed to the ongoing collapse of our former Middle Class that once provided the bulk of the tax revenue that financed this countries continued existence !

Sign up for our FREE newsletter!

Name:
Email:
Sign up to receive daily updates, political news, action letters and additional messages from Conservative Republican News

View our Privacy Policy

Join our FREE Newsletter!