2016 Election, Elections, Hillary Clinton

What’s this hole in Hillary’s tongue?


Two weeks ago, Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton experienced what could have been an epileptic seizure on camera. Then it appeared to happen again on stage at the Democratic National Convention immediately after her acceptance speech. Now, astute Internet sleuths have spotted a suspicious cavity on Clinton’s tongue that could be indicative of a biopsy:

I believe it may have been Glenn Reynolds who first examined the picture closely and wondered “What the heck is that dark thing on Hillary’s tongue?”

Suffice it to say that it doesn’t look like a throat lozenge that might have been employed to stay her persistent, sickly cough.

iOTWreport discovered a likely cause of said cavity:

It appears to be the result of a tongue biopsy.

Here’s the image in question:


If you want to read some saucy speculation about why Clinton might have needed a tongue biopsy, you can do so here. But theories aside, this isn’t the first time Clinton’s health has been called into question. Remember that concussion she suffered in 2012 after falling and hitting her head while “alone at her home in Washington”? State Department officials claimed she fainted due to dehydration, but a seizure very well could have been to blame.

  • thelastvoice

    I think she just acts strange so I’m not ready to buy in to the seizure speculation at this time. Could be wrong. Can’t we all? They would take a good look at that hole In prison (maybe the one in her mouth also…….)


    Great, an epileptic with her finger on the Nuclear Launch Button !

    • that isn’t funny. i knew a kid w/ that problem & he was teased mercilessly 4 it. btw, i despise hillary the c-nt.

      • RLTMLT

        Wasn’t meant to be funny, maniacs like Clinton continue to approve the endless production of Nuclear Weapons that have the potential to end all life on earth one hundred times over, yet Trump is defined as the crazy one ! Epileptics had no say in inheriting there condition, Hillary’s consistent war mongering is exclusively her choice !

    • edwin

      Rumors about Democratic presidential candidate’s having some kind of (potentially debilitating) neurological disorder have circulated ever since the then-secretary of state fainted from dehydration while suffering from a stomach virus and sustained a concussion in December 2012. Those rumors were resurrected in July 2016 when a video clip of Clinton was circulated along with claims that it showed her experiencing a brief seizure and proved she was ill and unfit to hold office:
      This was more than a month old when it went viral in July 2016. NBC News posted a video of the incident taken from another angle on 10 June 2016 and explained that Clinton had just been asked about the possibility of her selecting Elizabeth Warren as her running mate as she left a meeting with the Massachusetts senator:
      The occurrence depicted above was covered by several news outlets in June 2016, with none of them reporting the candidate had experienced a “seizure.” The Hill, for instance, reported that Clinton “exaggeratedly bob(bed) her head” after reporters repeated the question about Warren, while the New York Daily News wrote that Clinton “gave an exaggerated startled response” to the question.
      CBS reporter Hannah Chanpong suggested that Clinton movements were simply an exaggerated reaction to her being “startled” when some reporters in her blind spot started suddenly barraging her with questions about her putative vice presidential choice. The fact that Clinton immediately repeated her initial reaction for humorous effect supports the hypothesis that it stemmed from a conscious movement and not an involuntary seizure:

      • Honest Abe

        Now that we know seizures, being startled, dehydration, et.al. are not the cause, then the only explanation is that she is perhaps mentally ill or overly self-absorbed, suffering from something which causes her to constantly skirt the truth and avoid any self-blame for failure while cursing others for her mistakes and lusting for riches and power, often by improper means, to satisfy something she missed in her childhood. She and Bill would be a model clinical study.

        • edwin

          I think you have your message mixed up with Donald Trump. At least that seems to be who you are describing

          • Honest Abe


          • edwin

            Then you are lying

          • Honest Abe

            Nope. I did write it.

          • edwin

            You right wingers love right wing conspiracies. You never let the facts get in the way. Debating with a conservative is like cleaning up your dog’s vomit: It is an inevitable consequence of your association, he isn’t much help, and it makes very clear the fact that he will swallow anything.
            I will never understand the far right’s mindset, so I don’t even waste one second of my time trying to do so. All you need to know is that they’re batshit crazy, off-the-charts lunatics who believe everything that comes out of their czars’ mouths, and will not ever question anything. You cannot reason with these kind of people, nor does any logic about anything apply to them. They’re robots without brains and do as they’re told. Pretty scary, isn’t it?
            (The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. – John Kenneth Galbraith )
            Right Wing Republicans are like alligators, all mouth and no ears.
            Anybody heard of the Clinton Scandal Paradox, for lack of a better word? It’s a form of cognitive dissonance that infects many Bubble People. Let me explain it.
            There is a small minority of gullible nonthinkers and confused conspiracy theorists who believe that Hillary Clinton is guilty of some ethereal set of crimes or unethical behavior. They are unable to articulate what the crimes are because they only exist in a muddled state of chaos in their confused imaginations. They were implanted by right-wing propagandists and their media accomplices. I realize that, to confused conservatives, nothing needs to make sense, logic is turned upside down, common sense is the first thing thrown out the window, and trying to reconcile actual facts with the confusion that they live with on a daily basis is not exactly a priority.
            Here’s a CHALLENGE. How do you nonthinkers rationalize the fact that there is not now, and never has been, any proof that Hillary Clinton is guilty of any of the crimes and unethical behavior that YOU have allowed yourselves to be brainwashed into believing by your idiotic right-wing idols?
            Don’t be mindless sheep and go rebleating the right wing lies and disinformation that you have been brainwashed to believe. They are NOT PROOF!!!!! I ask for PROOF, not the lies and disinformation, itself.

          • Honest Abe

            Why do you want proof? I told you I wrote it.

          • edwin

            what the hell did you write

          • Honest Abe

            See the above post from two days ago, edwin.

          • edwin

            I did read it again and sure enough you are describing Donald Trump/ There is nothing that describes Hillary just your right wing conspiracy bull crap

          • Honest Abe

            edwin, edwin, you see only what you want to see and condemn those who do not fit within your narrow spectrum of views, not an admirable trait for a free thinker as yourself.

          • edwin

            I see through your right wing rhetoric very well. I have read thousands of the right wing conspiracy talking points and its all a bunch of crap

          • Honest Abe

            edwin, if you and your fellow believers were given the total control and supreme authority of this country, how would you accommodate people like me and those you despise as being the “right wing”?

          • edwin

            There have been many times in the past 80+ years that the democrat’s had complete control. The two parties worked together for the betterment of the country. Since the Republicans took control of the house in 1994, its been down hill. Especially since the Tea Baggers came along its really been bad. With their just say no policy there are no accomplishments for you or anybody else like there use to be. In America, majority rules. If your position is in the minority, get out and work to get your positions presented. Your party I assume(GOP) has had control of the congress off and on since 1994. What have they accomplished, nothing but gridlock. your positions and everyone else’s never get addressed what ever it is that you feel is your position on any given subject.

          • Honest Abe

            You have purposely avoided my direct question. Is it too much to ask?

          • edwin

            I don’t know what it is that you expect if the left is in power vs the right in power. What do you want that can be achieved with the left in power. What is it you want to be accommodated.
            The fundamental differences between left-wing and right-wing ideologies center around the the rights of individuals vs. the power of the government. Left-wing beliefs are liberal in that they believe society is best served with an expanded role for the government. People on the right believe that the best outcome for society is achieved when individual rights and civil liberties are paramount and the role — and especially the power — of the government is minimized.
            Examples of an expanded role for the government include entitlement programs such as social security and Medicare, Medicaid, universal healthcare, food stamps, free public education, unemployment benefits, strong environmental laws, and other regulations on industries. Right wing ideology would favor market-based solutions to the issues that these government programs aim to tackle. For example, encouraging a freer marketplace for healthcare, driven by consumer choice to drive down costs. Or privately held retirement accounts like 401(k) plans instead of government-guaranteed Social Security
            Right-wing conspiracy theory tends to focus on efforts by communists and other hard-core, organized socialists, fascists, and advocates of Big Government to impose an absolute tyranny or “New World Order” on Americans in particular and mankind in general in which major industries and products (food, energy, media, money and banking, etc.) would be owned or controlled by government bureaucrats as world monopolies with no private alternatives allowed — and the rights of peaceful people in their lives and properties destroyed completely by political central planning and control. As major steps in the direction of bigger and more intrusive government over our lives and businesses, right wingers can point with dismay at several successful political achievements, made by the organized Left over several decades, such as the enactment of the Income Tax (second plank of Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto), the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (fifth plank in the Communist Manifesto), increasing control over education by the national government, inheritance taxes, the UN, the Environmental Protection Agency and various “environmentalist” regulations on private business and land use, and many other political attacks on private property rights and the private plans of individuals over their own lives. From the Right’s point of view, these measures must be abolished or rolled back as soon as it is politically possible to do so — rather than remaining as permanent fixtures in American society. Right wingers would return the government to the restrictions imposed on it by the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and (ideally) limit government’s scope to using its powers to combat criminal violence and commercial fraud, and to defend against foreign aggressors, as opposed to trying to organize society through any politically imposed central plan or trying to ameliorate inequalities of wealth or income.
            Left-wing conspiracy theories, on the other hand, tend to see the source of evil in the world as private selfishness, the profit motive, private property itself, American capitalism (as based on private property rights and the profit motive), and irreconcilable “class differences” (between the workers who use the tools and machines and those who own the tools and machines). The Left fears what it perceives as the “economic power” of Big Business, and considers this power to be “exploitative” in a bad sense — an “unfair” advantage of the “strong” over the “weak” resulting from a lack of sufficient government regulation in a free-market economy. It is because of this belief system and the fear of “economic power” that those on the Left agitate for more and more government controls and regulations. Further, the Left seems obsessed with a vision of a politically planned society, in which each individual would be made to conform to a planning matrix devised by supposedly superior philosopher-king bureaucrats. Only in this way, they believe, can war and social disharmony in the world be eradicated forever — and only then will the “economic power” of corporations be stifled.
            So what are you looking for in an administration.

          • Honest Abe

            Interesting answer, edwin, but not what I was asking for. If I understand what you did write, the hole in Hillary’s tongue was photo-shopped by a left wing economic group so that a evil right wing conspiracy will be deceived into declaring government too big so that the free pursuit of capitalism on a global scale is best accomplished by reading Marx’s Communist Manifesto (Second Plank) after which all nuclear weapons will be abolished and peace pops out all over, hallelujah. If such as you said is the golden path to the future of humankind, it still does not tell me how you will accommodate those in your perfect society who choose to oppose you.

  • David Schultz

    Oral herpes?

  • tongue piercing?

  • Ldedwards


  • Denise

    Giving Slick Willy too many BJs.

  • Phytomorphogenesis

    Obituary soon?
    Gross. Mr. Trump will be up against… *gulps* Virginia’s failed governor Tim Kaines.
    He is so creepy. We have never seen a more feminine man than this man.

  • Littleredtop

    Could this have something to do with contact from extra terrestrials? Just a thought.

Sign up for our FREE newsletter!

Sign up to receive daily updates, political news, action letters and additional messages from Conservative Republican News

View our Privacy Policy

Join our FREE Newsletter!