President Donald Trump has determined that urgent action in Syria was necessary to degrade the ability of the Bashar al-Assad regime to deliver further chemical weapons attacks there or anywhere else in wake of the horrific gas attack in Iblid.
But further action is going to have to involve Congress.
There is no authorization to use force against Syria and the Assad regime. This is an Article I question. Congress still needs to debate that.
Under the War Powers Act, a president has 60 days to act without Congressional authorization.
But military forces have been conducting air strikes in Syria since 2014, and boots have been on the ground since 2015.
Relying on more than decade old authorizations to use force are not sufficient. This is a new war, and it is clear President Trump has long-term objectives in Syria.
Retaliating against Syria may be the right thing to do, but now getting the support of the American people’s representatives in Congress is the constitutional thing to do. Congress would likely back Trump’s actions.
And American armed forces deserve to know that Congress has their backs
As the American people receive clarity on the specifics of the attack in Idlib, the question remains whether spending our time, treasure and blood in Syria worth it? Is this in America’s interests?
Does this put America first?
That is the question every decision must be based on, the only premise on which we can act and no other.
Taking military action as a first resort rarely turns out well. We’ve taken regime change in Iraq and again in Libya, turning both into active civil wars, and the jury’s still out in Afghanistan. May seem like a good idea, but we haven’t had much luck with it in the past decade.
Regime change? To whom?
Who would we be turning Syria over to?
There is little basis for civil society, religious freedom and stable parliamentary-style systems there.
What comes next?
The question is whether what’s left behind is better than what existed before, and the failure of regime change over the past two Administrations demands caution.
Congress must decide the extent that further action is warranted.
This is a guest post by Rick Manning President of Americans for Limited Government.
Sign up for our FREE newsletter!Sign up to receive daily updates, political news, action letters and additional messages from Conservative Republican News
June 23, 2017 By D.E.
November 10, 2016 By Katie
March 21, 2016 By Katie
December 19, 2016 By Kent Kellar
- More liberal terrorism: Two charged with attempted murder in stabbing at Trump event
- HIT LIST: Liberals have vowed to kill 30 GOP congressmembers in just the last 7 weeks
- Micheal Brown tried to kill a police officer, so the government is paying his parents
- Kids whose Trump photos were censored from yearbook just got a YUGE care package
- Teachers packing books and HEAT at these schools
- INSANE DASH CAM: Woman LOSES HER MIND over traffic ticket
- MORE LIBERAL TERRORISM: Yet another Democrat arrested for yet another assassination threat
- EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Incoming? Activity detected at North Korean nuclear weapons site
- How to get shot by the police during a routine traffic stop…
- Canadian sniper’s kill shot is world-record breaking HOW MANY yards?!?!