Immigration, Issues

Texas Takes Strong and Needed Action on Sanctuary Cities

3

Photo: Ed Schipul/Flickr (cc by-sa 2.0)

Do you think more states should stand up to unlawful and dangerous sanctuary city policies? Let us know in the comments. – Ed.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott acted to protect the citizens of Texas on Sunday when he signed into law SB 4, a bill to punish (and deter) local cities and counties like Austin from implementing sanctuary policies.

Abbott and the legislators who sponsored this bill are trying to stop the Lone Star State from being a sanctuary for criminal aliens. They want to make sure that criminals are removed from the state and deported from the country, rather than remaining in Texas so they can victimize even more citizens of the state.

SB 4 requires local governments in the state to comply with federal immigration law. That includes 8 U.S.C. § 1373, which forbids state and local governments from preventing their officials from exchanging information with the federal government on the citizenship status of any individual.

Under the new Texas law, local governments can’t prevent their law enforcement officials from sending information to the feds on criminals they have arrested or detained.

City and county officials also can’t prevent federal immigration officers from enforcing immigration laws in local jails, and are charged with “assisting or cooperating with a federal immigration officer as reasonable or necessary” to provide “enforcement assistance.”

Further, Texas law enforcement agencies are directed to “comply with, honor, and fulfill any request made in the detainer request provided by the federal government.”

This means that local jurisdictions that fail to honor federal detainer warrants—which are requests issued by federal immigration authorities to hold illegal aliens for pickup—will also be in violation of state law.

SB 4 imposes a civil penalty on sanctuary cities of up to $25,500 for each day of intentionally violating this law. In a fitting sense of justice, the civil penalties collected will be deposited in a special victim’s crime fund set up by the state.

This means that those who have been victimized by criminal illegal aliens will be able to seek compensation from this fund. Local law enforcement officials, such as sheriffs and chiefs of police, can also be charged with a Class A misdemeanor for failing to comply with federal detainer warrants.

Finally, local officials who refuse to comply with SB 4 and who implement sanctuary policies or ordinances can be removed from office. Petitions for their removal are filed by the attorney general of Texas, and such petitions will get the same precedence as election contests under Texas law.

This ensures that such petitions will not languish in court behind other cases. And Texas courts are directed to remove that official if he or she is found guilty—judges have no discretion to keep the official in office.

Abbott said he signed this bill because public safety is his top priority: “This bill furthers that objective by keeping dangerous criminals off our streets.”

Abbott added that it is “inexcusable to release individuals from jail that have been charged with heinous crimes like sexual assault against minors, domestic violence, and robbery.”

He said that such behavior by local officials would no longer be “tolerated,” and that SB 4 was “doing away with those that seek to promote lawlessness in Texas.”

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who also supports the new law, pointed out that “in the past six years, criminal aliens have been charged with more than 566,000 crimes in Texas including kidnapping, homicide, burglary and much more.”

As he said, “there is no excuse for endangering our communities by allowing criminal aliens who have committed a crime to go free.”

Given the large number of crimes committed by recidivist criminal aliens, the claim by some in Texas that this bill will make “our communities more dangerous” defies common sense.

This is particularly true because the new law exempts an illegal alien who “is a victim of or witness to a criminal offense,” or “is reporting a criminal offense.” Thus, it will not deter the reporting of crimes.

As I have pointed out before, sanctuary policies endanger the residents of the very cities they are claimed to “help.” Criminal aliens who would otherwise be detained and removed from sanctuary cities are instead released back into the community, where they can commit more crimes.

One Government Accountability Office study of the criminal histories of 55,322 illegal aliens showed that they had been arrested 459,614 times and committed almost 700,000 offenses.

The vast majority of these crimes would never have been committed if we had a secure border that prevented these criminal aliens from entering the country in the first place, or if we had an effective policy of removing them once they did make it here, or after being detained or arrested for committing a crime.

The Texas governor and legislators are trying to protect their state’s residents from the reckless and irresponsible decisions being made by local jurisdictions to release criminal aliens and to obstruct enforcement of federal immigration law.

This is a good start and the right thing for them to do.

Hans von Spakovsky, The Daily Signal

  • Texas Belle

    The Leaders in any city who withhold criminals from ICE, and/or from justice for their crimes should be prosecuted. Releasing illegal aliens to the streets after they have committed crimes, as some Judges have done, is itself a crime. The thinking behind this practice is inexplicable to me; they don’t routinely release American citizens accused of a crime–do they? Liberals do not seem to grasp the meaning of “illegal” when it suits their purpose; they ignore any law with which they disagree. This leads to anarchy which is what we are now facing if these Judges are not reined in. Obama’s 8 years led to this situation because of his obvious racism, and his favoritism toward terrorists from the Middle East. His immigration policies, along with many other policies, were a disaster for this country and it will take many years for recovery. Trump can’t do it within 3 months, as some people have been led to believe, since it took Obama 8 years to destroy law and order.

  • MarcJ

    The penalties should include the impoundment of private funds of those criminal government members who voted for the establishment of sanctuary status.

  • Don Harper

    The good Governor is reinforcing Federal Law by introducing state law and reinforcing federal law. The leaders of cities and states that block or contravene the federal and state laws regarding the reporting, arrest, deporting, charging etc. of illegals should be arrested, charged and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Allowing this illegal behavior puts every american at risk, costs cities, states and the federal government billions of taxpayer dollars that could be better spent on infrastructure and defense, or looking after our neglected veterans. The excuse that they are doing work Americans wont do is bull and holds no water. Implement workfare programs for those collecting social assistance that are able to work would solve that problem. As far as the Islamic immigration issue, many of their countries have been “unfriendlies” for years and yet out former administration opened our doors to people hostile to our democratic, Christian way of life. We can help them where they are by setting up safe protected compounds and eliminating the leaders of those enemy countries and working to bring peace to their regions. Obama created a planned program to allow entry and we are now paying a very high price. President Trump, keep up the good fight, work to rid the party of the rhinos that are abetting the problem, and keep the nation safe

Sign up for our FREE newsletter!

Sign up to receive daily updates, political news, action letters and additional messages from Conservative Republican News

View our Privacy Policy

Join our FREE Newsletter!