2016 Election, Donald Trump, Media, Russia, The White House

Rock Solid Proof The DNC Email Leak Was Internal

2

A new forensic study of the DNC email “hack” has provided strong evidence that the leak came from inside the DNC and was not a product of any Russian interference.

Image Credit: geralt Public Domain CC0

New meta-analysis has emerged from a document published today by an independent researcher known as The Forensicator, which suggests that files eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona were likely initially downloaded by a person with physical access to a computer possibly connected to the internal DNC network. The individual most likely used a USB drive to copy the information. The groundbreaking new analysis irrevocably destroys the Russian hacking narrative, and calls the actions of Crowdstrike and the DNC into question.

The document supplied to Disobedient Media via Adam Carter was authored by an individual known as The Forensicator. The full document referenced here has been published on their blog. Their analysis indicates the data was almost certainly not accessed initially by a remote hacker, much less one in Russia.

The mainstream media and their allies in the Democratic Party have pushed the narrative that the email hack was the work of Russian agents trying to have an impact on the 2016 Presidential election.

This new data basically slams shut the Russian hacking narrative in favor of the one that has been most likely from the beginning . . . that someone at the DNC leaked the emails in retaliation for the DNC’s rigging of the Presidential primary process against Bernie Sanders and for Hillary Clinton.

The evidence provided by the Forensicator is very detailed and paints a clear picture of the route this information took before it ended up with Wikileaks.

The document states that the files that eventually published as “NGP-VAN” by Guccifer 2.0 were first copied to a system located in the Eastern Time Zone, with this conclusion supported by the observation that “the .7z file times, after adjustment to East Coast time fall into the range of the file times in the .rar files.” This constitutes the first of a number of points of analysis which suggests that the information eventually published by the Guccifer 2.0 persona was not obtained by a Russian hacker.

Image via The Forensicator

The Forensicator stated in their analysis that a USB drive was most likely used to boot Linux OS onto a computer that either contained the alleged DNC files or had direct access to them. They also explained to us that in this situation one would simply plug a USB drive with the LinuxOS into a computer and reboot it; after restarting, the computer would boot from the USB drive and load Linux instead of its normal OS. A large amount of data would then be copied to this same USB drive.

In this case, additional files would have been copied en masse, to be “pruned” heavily at a later time when the 7zip archive now known as NGP-VAN was built. The Forensicator wrote that if 1.98 GB of data had been copied at a rate of 22.6 MB/s and time gaps t were noticed at the top level of the NGP-VAN 7zip file were attributed to additional file copying, then approximately 19.3 GB in total would have been copied. In this scenario, the 7zip archive (NGP-VAN) would represent only about 10% of the total amount of data that was collected.

The very small proportion of files eventually selected for use in the creation of the “NGP-VAN” files were later published by the creators of the Guccifer 2.0  persona. This point is especially significant, as it suggests the possibility that up to 90% of the information initially copied was never published.

These seemingly small details ferreted out by the Forensicator add to the veracity of their conclusions that it had to be a local invasion not a remote one.

The use of a USB drive would suggest that the person first accessing the data could not have been a Russian hacker. In this case, the person who copied the files must have physically interacted with a computer that had access to what Guccifer 2.0 called the DNC files. A less likely explanation for this data pattern where large time gaps were observed between top level files and directories
in the 7zip file, can be explained by the use of ‘think time’ to select and copy 1.9 GB of individual files, copied in small batches with think time interspersed. In either scenario, Linux would have been booted from a USB drive, which fundamentally necessitates physical access to a computer with the alleged DNC files.

The Forensicator believed that using the possible ‘think-time’ explanation to explain the time-gaps was a less likely explanation for the data pattern available, with a large amount of data most likely copied instantaneously,  later “pruned” in the production of the Guccifer 2.0’s publication of the NGP-VAN files.

It also calls into question the way the DNC handled this situation including its curious use of Crowdstrike, an IT company with strong leftist ties, to be the only ones to see the initial data and then make a conclusion blaming Russian hackers.

Disobedient Media previously reported that Crowdstrike is the only group that has directly analyzed the DNC servers. Other groups including Threat Connect have used the information provided by Crowdstrike to claim that Russians hacked the DNC. However, their evaluation was based solely on information ultimately provided by Crowdstrike; this places the company in the unique position of being the only direct source of evidence that a hack occurred.

The group’s President Shawn Henry is a retired executive assistant director of the FBI while their co-founder and CTO, Dmitri Alperovitch, is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, which as we have reported, is linked to George Soros. Carter has stated on his website that “At present, it looks a LOT like Shawn Henry & Dmitri Alperovitch (CrowdStrike executives), working for either the HRC campaign or DNC leadership were very likely to have been behind the Guccifer 2.0 operation.”

One key leg of the entire Russia conspiracy narrative is now turned completely to dust.  It’s not likely to stop the witch hunt against the President but at least this charge is now up in smoke.

 

  • sk_in_co

    And now if they can only find a file in there that is unique to Seth Rich (the mysteriously murdered Wash DC pro-Bernie DNC staffer). It makes simple sense that Seth Rich (or maybe someone he knew well) was responsible then he was killed for it – Congress should investigate that SINCE NO ONE ELSE HAS besides a private investigator. Or we can continue to spend years and millions looking for Russians under every rock we ignore the obvious.

  • Robert Pekarik

    To quote Mark Levin: “The democrat party is corrupt to the core.”

Sign up for our FREE newsletter!

Name:
Email:
Sign up to receive daily updates, political news, action letters and additional messages from Conservative Republican News

View our Privacy Policy

Join our FREE Newsletter!