Soros

Soros caught paying Al Gore to spread climate hoax

39

Click here to DEPORT GEORGE SOROS!

I guess Al Gore already spent all his Qatari oil money.

That’s because new documents reveal Gore’s multi-million dollar campaign to spread Fake Science is being funded by creepy billionaire George Soros.

The Daily Caller reports:

A document published by DC Leaks shows Soros, a Hungarian-born liberal financier, wanted his nonprofit Open Society Institute (OSI) to do more to support global warming policies in the U.S. That included budgeting $10 million in annual support to Gore’s climate group over three years.

“U.S. Programs Global Warming Grants U.S. Programs became engaged on the global warming issue about four years ago, at George Soros’s suggestion,” reads a leaked OSI memo.

“There has been a budget of $11 million for global warming grants in the U.S. Programs budget for the last several years,” the memo reads. “This budget item captures George Soros’s commitment of $10 million per year for three years to Al Gore’s Alliance for Climate Protection, which conducts public education on the climate issue in pursuit of creating political space for aggressive U.S. action in line with what scientists say is necessary to put our nation on a path to reducing its outsize carbon dioxide emissions.”

So who’s funding Fake Science and globalist anti-American economic policies? George Soros, who stands to make billions off the phony “carbon credits” market and by reducing the size of the U.S. economy to give his foreign companies less competition.

  • daves

    I can’t believe that there are still people that refuse to believe the science of global warming.

    What does this article have to do with anything? It’s pointless except that it tries to reinforce the ignorance about the scientific evidence. Who cares what charities Mr. Soros donates to?

    • Daniel F. Melton

      Perhaps your disbelief stems from a refusal to recognize or admit that anthropogenic global warming is a complete fraud perpetrated in order to facilitate the imposition of a global government, and lo, There is the corruptocrat united nations (major participant in the stratagem) ready and willing to take up the task

      • daves

        You are sort of correct. I refuse to believe anything without evidence. The evidence of AGW is overwhelming.

        • DaveM

          Not according to NASA! The overwhelming part comes from the lies and hoaxes that have been created. The polar bear was thought to be on the endangered list…the truth…they are more populous now than they have been in 50 years. Be cautious what you read and do some research. You present yourself as an intelligent person!

          • daves

            You think NASA doesn’t agree that people are causing global warming? I can share their website if you want to read it.

            Polar bears are threatened by global warming. The only areas where population is up are in Canada where hunting has recently been outlawed.

          • DaveM

            It
            is possible to alter perceptions, look at these two images, both use
            the same data from the same day, but one looks hotter than the other.

            http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/map/images/

            http://weather.unisys.com/surface/sst_an

        • Daniel F. Melton

          The evidence of AGW is underwhelming.

          Every prediction of climatological disaster has either expired or had the purported date of the “end of the world” extended so far into the future as to be meaningless.
          There has been a hiatus in “warming” of two decades, in spite of “adjustments” to the historical data, the exposure of which only serves to focus attention on the fraud.

          • daves

            If you’re reading predictions they are not from any research or science.

            The last two decades have been the hottest on record. Anyone telling you different is lying.

            Adjustments to the temperature record have been audited and validated over and over. Without the adjustments the record would show more global warming, not less.

            Stop getting your information from politicians and political websites. Follow the research.

          • Daniel F. Melton

            You and those worshiping at the altar of agw are the liars.

          • daves

            Really? Where’s your proof?

      • Robert

        Daniel F. Melton
        If Accelerated Global Warming is such a hoax, then please explain to everyone why 95% of the experts in the world agree with the scientific evidence that proves it. I would think you were one of the people saying the Scientist were wrong when they were trying to prove smoking caused illness and sometimes cancer, I remember all the things back then saying that was a hoax also saying the Government was lying and the Tobacco people were right that smoking did not harm persons. when any fool know you do not inhale smoke for any reason .
        Now it is the carbon based companies trying to convince everyone that it is a hoax because it is cutting into their profits heavily. The UN is an origin of the USA after WWII when the five world leaders sat down and divided the world up and decided to be the new World Government, it is here it is progressing and there will be a One World Government by the year 3000, which will control all countries and all outer space activities. If you look back at History you can see it coming from 2000 years ago up to the present with the constant combining to get bigger and more powerful.
        HAVE A GOOD DAY

        • MarcJ

          Please Sir look up on the Internet “Oregon Petition” and “Manhattan Declaration” to read the names of some 32,000 scientists and professionals who de-masked that far-left conspiracy to establish socialist dictatorship. I am a signatory to those documents – MS, PhD, Engineering, UCLA – with specialties in Thermodynamics and Heat & Mass Transfer.

          • Robert

            MarkJ
            Now how does this compare with the rest of the worlds Climate scientists who totally disagree with them in every respect, I do think if you want to play numbers 32,000 is such a small number when over 250,000 other scientists have proven their points with facts a lot coming from the ice cores of Antarcitia, which is far enough away from civilization to not be effected by people, in the USA we have over 100,000 Climate Scientist that attest to accelerated Global warming, from their studies.
            Accelerate Global Warming has nothing to do with a dictatorship, and by the year 3000 there will be a World Government, and by that time most will be trying to live underground to escape the heat if not in space colonies.
            HAVE A GOOD DAY

          • 9.8m/ss

            The Oregon Petition was a fraud when it was announced, on fake National Academy of Sciences letterhead, and it still is. Anyone claiming to hold a bachelor of science was qualified to sign it. They eventually removed the obvious joke names, but they never verified the claimed credentials.

            Even so, it’s evidence for the consensus. The Oregon Petition was advertised heavily for over a decade, in print ads, postal junk mail, and the Internet social media of the day. Tens of millions of scientists, engineers, and other technical professionals saw the ads, and there was no risk in signing. But they only managed to collect 31,000 names, and only a dozen or so with climate research expertise. That’s about the same result later surveys of scientific opinion produced, which is over 90% of scientists and over 95% of climate experts agree that the climate has warmed over the last century and the warming is mostly the result of human civilization.

        • Daniel F. Melton

          You again.
          Your 95% of the “experts” is an imaginary number.
          The red herring “smoking” comparison has no relevance.

          In 1915, Lenin proposed a “United
          States of the World.” In 1936, the Communist International proclaimed:

          “Dictatorship can be established only by a victory of socialism
          in different countries…after which the proletariat republics would
          unite on federal lines with those already in existence, and this system
          of federal unions would expand…at length forming the World Union of
          Soviet Socialist Republics.”
          The u.n.’s first Sec.Gen was Soviet espionage
          agent Alger Hiss.
          The Communists saw the UN as a Trojan horse for Communist dominated,
          one world government.
          There’s no 2000 year history pointing to a one world government, unless you’re reading the communist literature.

          Provide us an example and live a completely carbon neutral lifestyle you demand of everyone else. Document every emission by weekly communications so we can check your progress, and when you fail to post we’ll know you froze or starved.

          • Robert

            Daniel F Melton
            No that is not an imaginary number that is fact from the fact check on the internet, The USA is is the only industrialized country that does not accept the finding of the Global Science community, could that be because we are the largest carbon fuel user next to China and they accept the findings.
            You speak of Socialism which in your mind is Communism apparently, Europe, Canada, and most of the industrialized world has been Democratic Socialism for over 100 years and I do not see them any different from the USA and they have higher GDP than the USA . I you can not look back at History and see a One World Government coming then you are not open eyed. We started as meandering persons then there were encampments then small gatherings, then villages, then the villages were deserted by most to move to small groupings called towns then those towns were slowly deserted for cities, then cities combined to make larger cities, nearly all small industry combined into large corporations, then smaller countries combined to make larger countries, and it goes on and on, there is already discussion of having borderless travel where persons can work, live and stay where ever they please in this world, the estimate is around 2400 when this will come to be.
            HAVE A GOOD DAY

      • 9.8m/ss

        If AGW is a fraud, then how do you explain the global warming observed over the last century? Besides industrial civilization, what’s different in the earth system between now and six thousand years ago?

    • DaveM

      Time to do research and actually learn what you are trying to talk about. Climate change ahas always been with the planet Earth. The same with atmospheric gases. All things change however, NASA has confirmed the amount of Ice in Antarctica has not changed in the past 20 years! Before you reply…do some research and analyze your writings. There is NO EVIDENCE , SCIENTIFIC OR OTHERWISE, in existences except lies and fraud!

    • MarcJ

      “The science of global warming”???

      Hoodwinking Americans is the essential part of the environmentalist agenda. Environmental activist Stephen Schneider told Discover magazine in 1989: “We have to offer up scary scenarios,
      make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we
      might have. … Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being
      effective and being honest”.

      In 1988, then-Sen. Timothy Wirth, D-Colo., said: “We’ve got to … try to ride the global warming issue.
      Even if the theory of global warming is wrong … we will be doing the right
      thing anyway in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.”

      To resume this-comedy in 3 acts performed by the US-taxpayer-paid ($25 billion per year) drones supervised by the UN socialist panel:

      1) New Ice Age panic in the 1970’s; remedy = our unilateral disarmament plus
      nationalize everything and establish a United Nations-supervised world
      socialist government “to spread the wealth around”, as proclaimed in 2009 by
      our Marxist Muslim ex-President from Kenya B. Hussein Obama; when that ice
      failed to show up the same criminals invented

      2) Global Warming scam in the 1990’s; remedy still the same. After 21 consecutive years
      of global COOLING as dictated by the 30-year solar cycle the same bunch of
      criminals declared

      3) Climate Change hoax; remedy – see above.

      Our former (thank God!) Marxist Muslim President B. Hussein Obama from Kenya bestowed $50 million of our money to the United Nations Climate Change fund organized by that criminal
      Paris Conference comedy. Mr. Trump – PLEASE – nullify this waste of our money
      and stop that socialist conspiracy! Yes – he did it

      Note: In frantic preparations for that infamous Paris Conference the “climate scientists” tried to cover up
      the evidence of GLOBAL COOLING by “refining” their computer models and “recalibrating” their thermometers RETROACTIVELY! Thus committing a scientific crime of the first order.

      • daves

        Even if all of that were true, it doesn’t change the scientific evidence one bit. Every scientific organization in the world agrees than humans are warming the planet.

        • Daniel F. Melton

          Another lie.

          • daves

            I don’t think so but if you know of any that disagree then please share.

          • 9.8m/ss

            All you have to do to show daves is wrong is name a scientific organization that disagrees with the principal findings from climate science. A university geology department would do, or some national academy of sciences. Just one.

          • Daniel F. Melton

            Of course, anything I come up with will be ridiculed and dismissed.

          • 9.8m/ss

            Give it a try. One scientific organization that disagrees with the premise behind the figures, 97% of climate experts, and over 90% of a large sample of all scientists, agree the climate has warmed over the last century and civilization is the cause. How about Liberty University, do they have a geology program, or teach an undergrad course in physical chemistry? And if you can’t name one, can you explain how all the universities in the world with geology programs could be teaching the same lie? Wouldn’t that take a conspiracy out of a spy novel?

          • Daniel F. Melton

            Nor playing your game.

          • 9.8m/ss

            Two days ago, you said daves was lying, right here. What was that about?

        • MarcJ

          You are right – even a lonely cow’s fart in Mongolia affects the world’s climate.

          • daves

            I know I’m right. I’ve done the research.

          • Macjamm

            You’ve done the research? Ha ha You mean you believe the constant barrage of climate change propaganda, The problem with you is you think WE the people that are skeptical of Climate Change have NOT done the research WE HAVE but we haven’t SHUT our MINDS OFF to the SCIENTISTS that are ALSO skeptical, we also don’t just blow it OFF every time the Global Warming HACKS get busted MANIPULATING data and out right lying LIKE YOU DO….

    • Macjamm

      Still trying to make Al Gore and ALL the ELITE EVEN RICHER I See..
      Yeah if we give them our money they will make global warming go away, but only after they turn the USA into a third World country… Ha ha You’re so funny…

      • daves

        Just trying to improve the reasoning skills of the gullible. The proof of global warming gets stronger by the day. It just takes an open mind and a little bit of effort to see it for yourself.

        • Macjamm

          The climate changes, has for over 4 billion years, Had you been around at the end of the ice age you would have tried to STOP IT? From what I understand we have enjoyed a really really moderate weather period for about the last 4 or 5 hundred years, Now you have IDIOTS blaming summer on global warming every storm there is on global warming EARTH quakes on global warming WARS on global warming and damnednear anything else that they can think of on GLOBAL WARMING, And the one thing they all have in common is that its all complete BS.. And you talk about reasoning SKILLS Ha ha ha ha….

    • 9.8m/ss

      I can. Investors in fossil fuels have $trillions at stake. They’re betting they’ll be able to delay rational public policy towards waste CO2 indefinitely. The value of their stocks depends on it. So the half $billion/year they spend on their campaign of deception is a reasonable expenditure. For that kind of money, you can hire the best marketing creatives and behavioral psychologists in the business. It’s no wonder they’ve fooled half the American public. Even reasonable people with technical educations are fooled.

    • MarcJ

      “Science of global warming”??? You komrad are behind the times – after 21 consecutive years of GLOBAL COOLING that criminal scam has been renamed into CLIMATE CHANGE hoax.

  • Daniel F. Melton

    According to agw fanatics, we’ve got to sacrifice our national and global economy to save the world from “anthropogenic global warming”; uh, “climate change”; no, wait, it’s “climate disruption”; well, maybe it’s “Global Climate Weirding”, perhaps it’s the dreaded but ever popular “Climate Collapse”,”Climate Chaos”,“Global Weirding”,”Tipping Point”, “Ocean Acidification”, or “Extreme Weather“ or it’s “Catastrophic Climate Disruption” and the renaming continues through endless iterations. It’s yet again been renamed “Dramatic Changes in Temperature and the State of the Atmosphere!”(commonly known as weather and seasons), and more recently renamed “Ecological Panic”, (which means something of an undefined nature might possibly occur at some unknown point in the future and maybe have unexplained negative effects), until they rename the non-phenomenon again. (edit 08/10/2017) And now they have! As the adult-sounding alternative term for the terms, “the sky is falling, we are all going to die and/or we are going to drown because the oceans are rising,” climate change is about to be retired for the far more descriptive phrase “weather extremes.” Those majestic priests of the cult refuse to allow the uninitiated to view the data and methods they have utilized to foretell the unimaginable disasters they predict. Professor Phil Jones of the CRU in charge of maintaining data sets famously told an Australian climate scientist in 2004: “Even if WMO agrees, I will still not pass on the data. We have 25 or so years invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it.”
    Never mind what we call it WE’VE GOTTA DO SOMETHING! Especially if it does nothing but increase the stranglehold of government regulations, makes rich liberal socialists even richer, collapses the global economy, and advances the cause of one world government with (even the most ardent supporters admit) no discernible effect on the climate.

    • 9.8m/ss

      Why would you pay any attention to “agw fanatics?” Fanatics are never reliable. You should get your science news from scientists and technical journalists. They’re the most reliable news sources around.

      • Daniel F. Melton

        Ya got to know what they’re saying so ya can be shutting ’em up so the politicians don’t listen to ’em.

        • 9.8m/ss

          Is there any other field of study where you prefer information from fanatics over information from experts?

Sign up for our FREE newsletter!

Sign up to receive daily updates, political news, action letters and additional messages from Conservative Republican News

View our Privacy Policy

Join our FREE Newsletter!