Issues, Tax

This Key Change Will Bring Money Pouring Back Into the US

1

President Donald Trump once called our tax code a “giant self-inflicted wound.”

Photo source: Pixabay, PublicDomainPictures, CC0 Public Domain,

He’s right—and one of the worst aspects of our broken code is the “worldwide” system of taxation.

Under current tax law, U.S. businesses are expected to pay the same amount of taxes on income they earn overseas as they would in the U.S. Of course, these same companies are also paying taxes in those foreign countries, which means their profits are being double-taxed.

Let’s look at an example.

Allan owns a company that sells baseball caps. Last year, he made $50,000 of profits in the United Kingdom. There, he has to pay the British government a 19 percent corporate tax, amounting to $9,500.

Allan wants to bring that money back to the United States. But to do so, he has to pay the U.S. government another 35 percent of those profits (that’s the current corporate tax rate), which means dishing out another $17,500.

So Allan initially made $50,000. Then, had to give $9,500 to the British government, and then another $17,500 to the U.S. government. Now, he only gets to keep $23,000—less than half of the profits he originally earned.

You can see why Allan has an incentive to keep his $40,500 in profits in Britain, as opposed to reinvesting in his business back home. And countless other companies feel that same incentive.

That’s bad for investment in America and for economic growth, and it’s why the new GOP tax plan has made a significant stride by proposing a “territorial tax system.”

The territorial system would allow all foreign subsidiaries to bring their earnings back to the U.S. with a 100 percent deduction. In other words, overseas profits made by U.S.-based companies will no longer be double-taxed because the U.S. government will no longer assess a tax when those profits are brought back to our shores to be spent or invested.

Let’s look at Allan’s baseball cap company again.

Under a territorial tax system, he would still have to pay a $9,500 tax on his $50,000 of income to Great Britain, but that’s all. He could bring the rest of his profits home to the U.S. without paying any taxes on them because they weren’t made within the U.S.

Under the territorial system, Allan gets to keep $40,500 in profits.

The U.S. already has the highest corporate tax rate in the developed world. U.S. companies are currently at a disadvantage when competing with other companies internationally because of the high tax burden.

A territorial system will encourage foreign business investment here in America and help bring back more than $2.6 trillion in profits currently locked out of the U.S. by our broken and outdated tax system.

Establishing a territorial tax would also encourage companies to stay in the U.S. rather than merging with international companies to avoid the tax burden. Only 20 percent of developed nations have worldwide tax systems, while the rest have territorial systems, putting the U.S. in the minority of the developed world. Heritage Foundation policy analyst Adam Michel gives some great examples:

Reacting to both the high U.S. corporate income tax rate and worldwide taxation, U.S. firms are pressured to merge with foreign competitors and move their new joint headquarters overseas to avoid the U.S. tax system. Prominent examples include Anheuser-Busch’s acquisition by Belgian brewer InBev, and Burger King’s buyout of Canadian Tim Hortons. U.S.-foreign mergers always reincorporate outside the U.S. Even if the merger is not explicitly tax motivated, the decision to not headquarter in the U.S. certainly is tax motivated.

American companies shouldn’t get special handouts to succeed in the marketplace. But they also shouldn’t have to start from a disadvantage to compete with international companies.

The answer is to reform our tax code and to adopt a territorial system for the 21st century.

This is a guest post by Sondra Clark the managing director of communications and grassroots at Heritage Action for America.
  • Robert

    Again another article that is so misleading it stinks. It starts off by saying that Corporations have to pay the full Corporate tax in both countries, which is totally wrong, the corporate tax rate works just like someone who has business in two states, what ever you pay in one state is deducted from what you owe in the other state the same is true with Corporations, what ever they payed in a foreign tax is deducted from what they pay here. Which no corporation has paid the 35% rate in the past 20 years.
    There must be something wrong with telling the truth, but then if they did they would not get your sympathy for a tax reduction for corporations which in most cases pay a lower percentage than a family making $75,000 yearly.
    http://money.cnn.com/2014/08/14/news/economy/corporate-taxes-inversion/index.html
    you may not like CNN but there are many other places where you can find the same information, here it is in one package, plain and simple.
    HAVE A GOOD DAY

Sign up for our FREE newsletter!

Sign up to receive daily updates, political news, action letters and additional messages from Conservative Republican News

View our Privacy Policy

Join our FREE Newsletter!